Close

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 47
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340


    Yes Reputation No

    Stage 6 Motorsports Precision 7675 Turbocharged built motor Jeep SRT8 - 751 wheel horsepower

    Someone was saying something about how the Challengers, Chargers, SRT's, etc., were weak? Um yeah no. 751 at the wheels on pump gas. That's just ridiculous. This is a road race Jeep too:

    Roadrace Jeep on pump gas today. Has our Base kit with a Precision Turbo & Engine 7675, Tial Wastegate and BOV, Injector Dynamics ID1000's, PWR Built Engine, Stage 6 Motorsports Custom Fuel System.

    Click here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hayward, CA
    Posts
    8,132
    Rep Points
    4,221.2
    Mentioned
    329 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    43


    Yes Reputation No
    Well I mean, can we get some specs, you drop the compression enough with the engine build, throw enough fuel / air at it with those injectors and turbo. 750 on pump makes a whole lot of sense for the cubes
    Vargas Turbocharger Technologies
    N54 1/2Mile World Record: 170.49MPH
    N55 World Record: 11.4 ET / 123MPH(AT) - 11.7ET / 122.7MPH(MT)
    N54 Stock Frame (100% E85) World Record: 699WHP / 714WTQ
    N54 Twin Turbo World Record: 847WHP/ 761WTQ
    N54 (ACN 91 octane only) World Record: 585WHP / 537WTQ
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge Website - Email
    #VTTDOMINATION #VTT #VARGASTURBO #VTTBOUNTY

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,659
    Rep Points
    2,216.2
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    23


    Yes Reputation No
    look at all that powaaaaaaaaaaa
    2006 AW/Black ZCP 6MT


    Click here to enlarge


    E46 M3 Owners of the World <---- Join the FB group!!


    Instagram :: @NotSMG.M3

    Click here to enlarge

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by VargasTurboTech Click here to enlarge
    Well I mean, can we get some specs, you drop the compression enough with the engine build, throw enough fuel / air at it with those injectors and turbo. 750 on pump makes a whole lot of sense for the cubes
    I have what is posted. It's a Hemi V8 probably the 6.1 and I'd guess compression is anywhere from 9.5:1 to 10.0:1.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Someone was saying something about how the Challengers, Chargers, SRT's, etc., were weak? Um yeah no. 751 at the wheels on pump gas. That's just ridiculous. This is a road race Jeep too:

    Roadrace Jeep on pump gas today. Has our Base kit with a Precision Turbo & Engine 7675, Tial Wastegate and BOV, Injector Dynamics ID1000's, PWR Built Engine, Stage 6 Motorsports Custom Fuel System.

    uhh..... They are weak in stock form. You cannot compare a Custom turbo/Built motor setup vs a stock one or mildly modified one. Come on @Sticky you know better.

    I will say that is a pretty sick setup for pump gas no denying that!
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    uhh..... They are weak in stock form. You cannot compare a Custom turbo/Built motor setup vs a stock one or mildly modified one. Come on @Sticky you know better.

    I will say that is a pretty sick setup for pump gas no denying that!
    They aren't weak at all in stock form. The Jeep SRT-8 is very quick.

    People are spoiled with numbers these days when even their own cars aren't 'quick' by their own standards.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    2014 Grand Cherokee SRT:

    0-60 in 5.0sec
    1/4 mile in 13.7

    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news

    Not that impressive overall. Cool Jeep though.
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    3,022
    Rep Points
    3,137.5
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    32


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    I believe that Stage 6 has pushed similar numbers on a stock bottom end 6.1, but its certainly a gamble. @rdeterman, the truck is 5k lbs dude, 13.7 is pretty damn quick for a 4wd 5k lb suv.
    2011 E90 M3 \ Melbourne Rot Metallic

    Click here to enlarge

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by lulz_m3 Click here to enlarge
    I believe that Stage 6 has pushed similar numbers on a stock bottom end 6.1, but its certainly a gamble. @rdeterman, the truck is 5k lbs dude, 13.7 is pretty damn quick for a 4wd 5k lb suv.
    I get what you're saying. I have driven the SRT Grand Cherokee. My wife actually has a 2011 Grand Cherokee Overland with the Hemi. The truck is a tank. Pushing ~750whp on a built motor/custom turbo setup on pump gas is pretty badass. I still stand by my original comment them being not that impressive in stock form. I have also driven a couple stock Challenger SRT-8's and a Hennessey supercharged Challenger SRT-8 and was very disappointed in both of those cars. If I had to choose id rather have the Jeep SRT vs any other SRT cars mentioned.
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    949
    Rep Points
    -431.5
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    2014 Grand Cherokee SRT:

    0-60 in 5.0sec
    1/4 mile in 13.7

    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news

    Not that impressive overall. Cool Jeep though.
    How is that not impressive for a stock, reasonably priced 2.5 ton vehicle?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,930
    Rep Points
    921.6
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    I get what you're saying. I have driven the SRT Grand Cherokee. My wife actually has a 2011 Grand Cherokee Overland with the Hemi. The truck is a tank. Pushing ~750whp on a built motor/custom turbo setup on pump gas is pretty badass. I still stand by my original comment them being not that impressive in stock form. I have also driven a couple stock Challenger SRT-8's and a Hennessey supercharged Challenger SRT-8 and was very disappointed in both of those cars. If I had to choose id rather have the Jeep SRT vs any other SRT cars mentioned.
    Agreed ^^^^ SRT Jeep is easily the best SRT in the lineup, but I still wouldn't buy anything SRT....too much $$$ for not enough performance
    2009 335i coupe back to stock...for now

    Click here to enlarge

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    3,022
    Rep Points
    3,137.5
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    32


    Yes Reputation No
    The new challenger SRT8's are like 492 hp, iirc.
    2011 E90 M3 \ Melbourne Rot Metallic

    Click here to enlarge

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    2014 Grand Cherokee SRT:

    0-60 in 5.0sec
    1/4 mile in 13.7

    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news

    Not that impressive overall. Cool Jeep though.
    Not that impressive compared to what?



    2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8
    BASE PRICE $55,295
    PRICE AS TESTED $56,600 (est)
    VEHICLE LAYOUT Front engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-doorClick here to enlarge SUV
    ENGINE 6.4L/470-hp/465-lb-ft OHV 16-valve V-8
    TRANSMISSION 5-speed automatic
    CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 5223 lb (55/45%)
    WHEELBASE 114.8 in
    LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 191.3 x 77.1 x 69.1 in
    0-60 MPH 4.6 sec
    QUARTER MILE 13.3 sec @ 103.2 mph
    BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 106 ft
    LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.88 g (avg) (avg)
    MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.8 sec @ 0.71 g (avg)
    EPA CITY/HWY FUEL ECON 12/18 mpg
    ENERGY CONSUMPTION, CITY/HWY 281/187 kW-hrs/100 miles
    CO2 EMISSIONS 1.37 lb/mile


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Nugs Click here to enlarge
    How is that not impressive for a stock, reasonably priced 2.5 ton vehicle?
    People are stupid.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,930
    Rep Points
    921.6
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by lulz_m3 Click here to enlarge
    The new challenger SRT8's are like 492 hp, iirc.
    Yet their performance is about the same as a bone stock 2007 335i....and has less luxury features...I mean even magazines compare it to the 5.0 and the SS, since it would be a joke to compare the R/T or bring in the Zl1 and a boss or cobra. Hey, everyone has what they like, but the SRT lineup just isn't a great choice for performance.
    2009 335i coupe back to stock...for now

    Click here to enlarge

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by mjmarovi Click here to enlarge
    Agreed ^^^^ SRT Jeep is easily the best SRT in the lineup, but I still wouldn't buy anything SRT....too much $$$ for not enough performance
    750 to four wheels on pump gas...

    What in the world do people want? These things run 9's.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by mjmarovi Click here to enlarge
    Yet their performance is about the same as a bone stock 2007 335i....and has less luxury features...I mean even magazines compare it to the 5.0 and the SS, since it would be a joke to compare the R/T or bring in the Zl1 and a boss or cobra. Hey, everyone has what they like, but the SRT lineup just isn't a great choice for performance.
    You're smoking crack if its about the same as a 2007 335i. The SRT8 6.4 is way faster and has way more potential.

    This Jeep will chew up and spit out any N54 in the land and it's on pump gas.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    uhh..... They are weak in stock form. You cannot compare a Custom turbo/Built motor setup vs a stock one or mildly modified one. Come on @Sticky you know better.

    I will say that is a pretty sick setup for pump gas no denying that!
    13.3 stock for an SUV is not weak at all. You just don't know what you're saying.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    We are talking two seperate things.
    Yes the turbo SRT is sweet and fast.
    Yes the stock one still doesn't impress me.

    Everyone has opinions. Like them or not.
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    Yes the stock one still doesn't impress me.

    Everyone has opinions. Like them or not.
    Have your opinion. I have mine.

    If the SRT8 Jeep is weak then so is the 335.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Have your opinion. I have mine.

    If the SRT8 Jeep is weak then so is the 335.
    If we are talking in stock form. I agree.
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,930
    Rep Points
    921.6
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Nugs Click here to enlarge
    How is that not impressive for a stock, reasonably priced 2.5 ton vehicle?
    Ok, if almost $60k is reasonable? Seriously?

    I'll take a BMW X5 thanks....which is a bigger car. Take the X3 and you're saving money, even 100% optioned out full MSRP on an X3 is $57k, and the X3 is the comparable sized vehicle to the SRT8. It's only slightly slower stock, and is just as fast or quicker with a simple tune. I wouldn't call a car priced the same as a fully loaded BMW SUV "reasonable"
    2009 335i coupe back to stock...for now

    Click here to enlarge

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    122,234
    Rep Points
    33,945.5
    Mentioned
    2184 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rdeterman Click here to enlarge
    If we are talking in stock form. I agree.
    What you're missing is one is an SUV and the other isn't.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,930
    Rep Points
    921.6
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Have your opinion. I have mine.

    If the SRT8 Jeep is weak then so is the 335.
    Hey lets face it, IMO the M3 in stock form is fairly weak, especially for the price, and the 335i is really weak.
    2009 335i coupe back to stock...for now

    Click here to enlarge

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    657
    Rep Points
    743.6
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    What you're missing is one is an SUV and the other isn't.
    I'm not missing anything.
    Click here to enlarge
    FBO's. Spec S2+. E85.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •